New socialisms futures beyond globalization
http://books.google.ca/books?id=YUGAAgAAQBAJ&pg=PT242&dq=New+socialisms+futures+beyond+globalization.+queer&hl=en&sa=X&ei=ZTsrVNG0EsGTyAS984L4CQ&ved=0CB4Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=New%20socialisms%20futures%20beyond%20globalization.%20queer&f=false
The moral pornographer would be an artist who uses pornographic material as part of the acceptance of the logic f a world of absolute sexual license for all the genderes, and projects a model of the way such a world might work. A moral pornographer might use pornography as a as a critique of current relations between the sexes. His/her busness would be the total demystification of the flesh and the subsequent revelation, through the infinite modulations of the sexual act, of the real relations of man and his kind [diverse degendered relations of humankind]. CARTER 1978
it is art of the disaster whose saying witnesses the singularity of beings
if sexual actions construct meaning between bodies, then the labour of performative sexual praxis constructs and records new meanings between sexual bodies
performative sexual praxis, belonging to marx’s broad understanding of labour as creative, self-affirming life-activity, is not reduced to labour-power in hegemonic pornography
the sexual practices take place in the context of an “eight billion dollar a year industry” in which sex is presented according to industrial formulae premised on variations of an overarching sexual script according to which females re endlessly fuckable, lustfully unable to control their sexuality, and “bad girls”, the repressively desublimated remnant of the phallic mother, exist under the law and pleasure principle of the father. what is implied about male sexuality is equally alienating: men are always hard, big and masterful, and able to temporarily give up control when it suits them.
sssspread = nonnormative pornography
SM is a really powerful way of acknowledging embodiement, especially for people who are “elsewhere than their body because your body isn’t where you’re at home”.
she discloses how the capacity for female ejaculation was socially designed out of the female body during the eighteenth century, only to be submerged in male pornography in the nineteenth century and codified as psychological and medical problem until well into the latter part of the twentith century, when it was rediscovered and redesigned by the lesbian and transgendered communities.
ssspreaad images, stories and interviews demonstrate that it is possible the produce nonrecuperable pornography and that this production falls necessarily into the terrirtory of the pervert.
phallic-widow mother, the post-male/post-female bastard orphan and the de-oedipalized stranger, those who are outside, don’t belong, incapable of belonging to heterosexuality. content is collectively determined by those involved in making the images and writing the texts and those actively viewing these images and texts.
http://books.google.ca/books?id=YUGAAgAAQBAJ&pg=PT242&dq=New+socialisms+futures+beyond+globalization.+queer&hl=en&sa=X&ei=ZTsrVNG0EsGTyAS984L4CQ&ved=0CB4Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=New%20socialisms%20futures%20beyond%20globalization.%20queer&f=false
The moral pornographer would be an artist who uses pornographic material as part of the acceptance of the logic f a world of absolute sexual license for all the genderes, and projects a model of the way such a world might work. A moral pornographer might use pornography as a as a critique of current relations between the sexes. His/her busness would be the total demystification of the flesh and the subsequent revelation, through the infinite modulations of the sexual act, of the real relations of man and his kind [diverse degendered relations of humankind]. CARTER 1978
it is art of the disaster whose saying witnesses the singularity of beings
if sexual actions construct meaning between bodies, then the labour of performative sexual praxis constructs and records new meanings between sexual bodies
performative sexual praxis, belonging to marx’s broad understanding of labour as creative, self-affirming life-activity, is not reduced to labour-power in hegemonic pornography
the sexual practices take place in the context of an “eight billion dollar a year industry” in which sex is presented according to industrial formulae premised on variations of an overarching sexual script according to which females re endlessly fuckable, lustfully unable to control their sexuality, and “bad girls”, the repressively desublimated remnant of the phallic mother, exist under the law and pleasure principle of the father. what is implied about male sexuality is equally alienating: men are always hard, big and masterful, and able to temporarily give up control when it suits them.
sssspread = nonnormative pornography
SM is a really powerful way of acknowledging embodiement, especially for people who are “elsewhere than their body because your body isn’t where you’re at home”.
she discloses how the capacity for female ejaculation was socially designed out of the female body during the eighteenth century, only to be submerged in male pornography in the nineteenth century and codified as psychological and medical problem until well into the latter part of the twentith century, when it was rediscovered and redesigned by the lesbian and transgendered communities.
ssspreaad images, stories and interviews demonstrate that it is possible the produce nonrecuperable pornography and that this production falls necessarily into the terrirtory of the pervert.
phallic-widow mother, the post-male/post-female bastard orphan and the de-oedipalized stranger, those who are outside, don’t belong, incapable of belonging to heterosexuality. content is collectively determined by those involved in making the images and writing the texts and those actively viewing these images and texts.
No comments:
Post a Comment